QUID PRO QUO
QUID PRO QUO
If it is QUID PRO QUO - sex for money - is that "sexual harassment"?
Can the millions of prostitutes worldwide who have received payment in return for selling their v. to their numerous male customers for many years suddenly start complaining of "sexual harassment" by their male customers? Rhetorical question.
Females who get jobs and continue to stay in jobs in return for sex with their male bosses and female students who get unfairly high marks in return for sex with their male teachers and their male professors - clear case of QUID PRO QUO too even if not for money as a public prostitute but bartering all the same - would it be correct to call these widespread incidents "sexual harassment"?
MODERN society does NOT call it "sexual harassment" when young and adult MALES KEEP ON FUCKING their numerous student and office girlfriends NOR when young and adult FEMALES KEEP ON GETTING FUCKED by their numerous student and office boyfriends because MODERN society dismisses it lightly as QUID PRO QUO - "I will give you money and gifts if you let me fuck you" and "I will let you fuck me if you give me money and gifts" - "We will both get mutual pleasure if you and I have sex" which is also QUID PRO QUO too even if not involving money and gifts because it is a case of "you scratch my back, I will scratch yours" - QUID PRO QUO.
Only unwilling sex by force would be rape (as long as it is not a case of consensual sex done on the sly opportunistically turning into rape when unexpectedly caught red-handed by guardians or by husband or another boyfriend).
Kishalay Sinha [G]
Does the s. Muslim female Imam Sherin Khankan (the Imam of Mariam Mosque in Copenhagen), the author of "WOMEN ARE THE FUTURE OF ISLAM", who is being interviewed by Stephen Sackur on BBC, EVER have ILLICIT immoral s. desire for Him? Sherin spends only 10% of her time on God, and 90% of her time on human rights. (Only 10%? God could justly complain of violation of His Divine Rights.) - G
Comments
Post a Comment